CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Fanteakwa (Ghana parliament constituency)

Ghana parliament constituency

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2024
Entity authorityQ16733509 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Fanteakwa constituency is in the Eastern region of Ghana. The current member of Parliament for the constituency is Kwabena Amankwah Asiamah. He was elected on the ticket of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and won a majority of 5,246 votes more than candidate closest in the race, to win the constituency election to become the MP. He succeeded Kwadjo Agyei Addo who had represented the constituency in the 4th Republican parliament.

Editorial summary

“Fanteakwa (Ghana parliament constituency)” enters the record as ghana parliament constituency. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Fanteakwa, Ghana and parliament can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 72-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Fanteakwa, Ghana and parliament.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Fanteakwa (Ghana parliament constituency)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Fanteakwa, Ghana and parliament provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q16733509. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fanteakwa (Ghana parliament constituency)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fanteakwa (Ghana parliament constituency) primary sources, Fanteakwa (Ghana parliament constituency) archive and Fanteakwa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fanteakwa (Ghana parliament constituency)”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Fanteakwa (Ghana parliament constituency)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.