CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Falcon 9 B1058

Falcon 9 first-stage booster, destroyed in recovery incident

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ112174919
Source-derived summary

Falcon 9 booster B1058 was a reusable Falcon 9 Block 5 first-stage booster manufactured by SpaceX. B1058 was the first Falcon 9 booster to fly fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, eighteen and nineteen times and broke a turnaround record on its later flights. Its first flight was for Crew Dragon Demo-2, on 30 May 2020, the first crewed orbital spaceflight by a private company. The booster was the first and only Falcon 9 booster to feature NASA's worm logo and meatball insignia, the former of which was reintroduced after last being used in 1992. The booster was destroyed several days after successfully landing on the autonomous spaceport drone ship Just Read the Instructions on 23 December 2023. B1058 toppled over as the drone ship sailed toward Port Canaveral in rough seas.

While in service, B1058 had an average turnaround time of 72 days with a record turnaround of 27 days and 8 hours. For its 19 flights, it held the Guinness World Record of most missions flown by a rocket first stage, until B1062 surpassed it by completing its 20th flight on 13 April 2024.

Flight history

First flight

B1058 entered service on May 30, 2020 launching Demo-2 from LC-39A to the International Space Station with astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley. It was the first crewed orbital spaceflight launched from the United States since the final Space Shuttle mission, and the first crewed flight test of Dragon 2. This was the first time US astronauts launched using a privately owned rocket and the first US crewed mission to the ISS in 9 years.

Editorial summary

“Falcon 9 B1058” enters the record as falcon 9 first-stage booster, destroyed in recovery incident. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Falcon, B1058 and first-stage can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020, 1992, 2023, 2024—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Falcon, B1058 and first-stage.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Falcon 9 B1058” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Falcon, B1058 and first-stage provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q112174919. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2020, 1992, 2023 and 2024.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Falcon 9 B1058”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Falcon 9 B1058 primary sources, Falcon 9 B1058 archive and Falcon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Falcon 9 B1058”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Falcon 9 B1058” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.