CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Fairlop (ward)

electoral ward in the London borough of Redbridge

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ56296030 ↗
Source-derived summary

Fairlop is an electoral ward in the London Borough of Redbridge. The ward has existed since the creation of the borough on 1 April 1965 and was first used in the 1964 elections. It returns three councillors to Redbridge London Borough Council.

Redbridge council elections since 2018

There was a revision of ward boundaries in Redbridge in 2018.

2022 election

The election took place on 5 May 2022.

2018 election

The election took place on 3 May 2018.

2002–2018 Redbridge council elections

There was a revision of ward boundaries in Redbridge in 2002.

2014 election

2010 election

2006 election

2002 election

1978–2002 Redbridge council elections

1998 election

The election took place on 7 May 1998.

1994 election

The election took place on 5 May 1994.

1990 election

The election took place on 3 May 1990.

Editorial summary

“Fairlop (ward)” enters the record as electoral ward in the London borough of Redbridge. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Fairlop, ward and electoral can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1965, 1964, 2018, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Fairlop, ward and electoral.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Fairlop (ward)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Fairlop, ward and electoral provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q56296030. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1965, 1964, 2018 and 2022.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fairlop (ward)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fairlop (ward) primary sources, Fairlop (ward) archive and Fairlop research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fairlop (ward)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Fairlop (ward)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.