CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of fact-checking websites

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ65082201
Source-derived summary

This list of fact-checking websites includes websites that provide fact-checking services about both political and non-political subjects.

Criteria

Whether a fact-checking site is in a network like the International Fact Checking Network can help to establish the reliability of a fact-checking organization.

International Fact-Checking Network

The International Fact Checking Network (IFCN), launched in 2015 by the Poynter Institute, set a code of ethics for fact-checking organizations. The IFCN reviews fact-checkers for compliance with its code, issuing a certification to publishers who pass the audit. The certification lasts for one year, and fact-checkers must be re-examined annually to retain their certifications. IFCN lists 170 organizations as members as of July 2024. Facebook and Instagram have used the IFCN's certification to vet publishers for fact-checking contracts.

European Fact-Checking Standards Network

The European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN) was launched in 2023 following a European Commission project to write the European Code of Standards for independent fact-checking organisations. The EFCSN reviews fact-checkers for compliance with its code and issues a certification to publishers who pass the audit of two independent assessors. The certification lasts for two years, and fact-checkers must be re-examined at the end of their certification in order to retain it.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “List of fact-checking websites” as wikimedia list article. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around List, fact-checking and websites.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2024, 2023—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with List, fact-checking and websites providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “List of fact-checking websites”, the useful work is to connect “wikimedia list article” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q65082201. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2024 and 2023.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of fact-checking websites”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of fact-checking websites primary sources, List of fact-checking websites archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of fact-checking websites”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from List of fact-checking websites” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.