Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press
Chinese university press
Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press (Chinese: 外语教学与研究出版社, FLTRP), is a foreign language publishing house affiliated with Beijing Foreign Studies University. It was established in 1979. In 2010, it was restructured into a co., ltd.
Overview
FLTRP has 10 branches and 12 independent legal entities. FLTRP also has a subsidiary brand of Beijing Foreign Language Audiovisual Publishing House (北京外语音像出版社), which is used to publish audiovisual products supplementing FLTRP books.
FLTRP is the largest foreign language and university press in China. FLTRP started as a language education publisher and has expanded into more subjects and areas. FLTRP provides offline and online training services for both teachers and students, and organizes many conferences and competitions. FLTRP publishes in nearly 80 languages, and has over 600 international partners.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press” as chinese university press. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as chinese university press. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q10932395. VIAF identifies the subject as 305959040. The Library of Congress control number is n83125479. None of the 5 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1979 and 2010.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press primary sources, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press archive and Foreign research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press”?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.