CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

FKG inequality

correlation inequality

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 10, 2025
Entity authorityQ1784730
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the Fortuin–Kasteleyn–Ginibre (FKG) inequality is a correlation inequality, a fundamental tool in statistical mechanics and probabilistic combinatorics (especially random graphs and the probabilistic method), due to Cees M. Fortuin, Pieter W. Kasteleyn, and Jean Ginibre (1971). Informally, it says that in many random systems, increasing events are positively correlated, while an increasing and a decreasing event are negatively correlated. It was obtained by studying the random cluster model.

An earlier version, for the special case of i.i.d. variables, called Harris inequality, is due to Theodore Edward Harris (1960), see below. One generalization of the FKG inequality is the Holley inequality (1974) below, and an even further generalization is the Ahlswede–Daykin "four functions" theorem (1978). Furthermore, it has the same conclusion as the Griffiths inequalities, but the hypotheses are different.

The inequality

Let

X

{\displaystyle X}

be a finite distributive lattice, and μ a nonnegative function on it, that is assumed to satisfy the (FKG) lattice condition (sometimes a function satisfying this condition is called log supermodular) i.e.,

μ

(

x

y

)

μ

(

x

y

)

μ

(

x

)

μ

(

y

)

{\displaystyle \mu (x\wedge y)\mu (x\vee y)\geq \mu (x)\mu (y)}

for all x, y in the lattice

X

{\displaystyle X}

.

The FKG inequality then says that for any two monotonically increasing functions ƒ and g on

X

{\displaystyle X}

, the following positive correlation inequality holds:

(

x

X

f

(

x

)

g

(

x

)

μ

(

x

)

)

(

x

X

μ

(

x

)

)

(

x

X

f

(

x

)

μ

(

x

)

)

(

x

X

g

(

x

)

μ

(

x

)

)

.

{\displaystyle \left(\sum _{x\in X}f(x)g(x)\mu (x)\right)\left(\sum _{x\in X}\mu (x)\right)\geq \left(\sum _{x\in X}f(x)\mu (x)\right)\left(\sum _{x\in X}g(x)\mu (x)\right).}

The same inequality (positive correlation) is true when both ƒ and g are decreasing.

Editorial summary

“FKG inequality” enters the record as correlation inequality. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what inequality and correlation can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1971, 1960, 1974, 1978—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around inequality and correlation.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“FKG inequality” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, inequality and correlation provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1784730. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1971, 1960, 1974 and 1978.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “FKG inequality”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow FKG inequality primary sources, FKG inequality archive and inequality research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “FKG inequality”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from FKG inequality” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.