CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

International Federation for Human Rights

international non-governmental organization

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ730498
Source-derived summary

The International Federation for Human Rights (French: Fédération internationale pour les droits humains, FIDH) is a non-governmental federation for human rights organizations. Founded in 1922, FIDH is the third oldest international human rights organization worldwide after Anti-Slavery International and Save the Children. As of 2025, the organization is made up of a federation of 196 organizations from 115 countries.

FIDH is nonpartisan, nonsectarian, and non-governmental. Its core mandate is to promote respect for all the rights set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Between 2009 and 2012, FIDH conducted 280 international missions focused on fact-finding, trial observation, solidarity, and advocacy in nearly 80 countries.

FIDH coordinates and supports collaborations with intergovernmental organizations.

Overview

FIDH was established in 1922, when it united ten national organizations. In 1927, the FIDH proposed an international declaration of human rights for adoption by states, followed by a bill of human rights in the 1930s. Neither initiative was adopted before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Editorial summary

“International Federation for Human Rights” enters the record as international non-governmental organization. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what International, Federation and Human can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1922, 2025, 2009, 2012—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1922. Its strongest next move is a source search built around International, Federation and Human.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“International Federation for Human Rights” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, International, Federation and Human provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q730498. VIAF identifies the subject as 151960213. The Library of Congress control number is n83141850. Authority coordinates are 48.853, 2.378. 3 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1922, 2025, 2009 and 2012.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “International Federation for Human Rights”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow International Federation for Human Rights primary sources, International Federation for Human Rights archive and International research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “International Federation for Human Rights”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from International Federation for Human Rights” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.