CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

FC Uralan Plus Moscow

football club

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 11, 2024
Entity authorityQ16677976 ↗
Source-derived summary

FC Uralan Plus Moscow (Russian: «Уралан-ПЛЮС» (Москва)) was a Russian football team from Moscow. It played professionally from 2000 to 2003 in the Russian Second Division. Their best result was 3rd place in Zone Center in 2002 season. In 2003 season they dropped out of the competition after 8 games due to lack of financing.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “FC Uralan Plus Moscow” is football club. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Uralan, Plus and Moscow, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000, 2003, 2002—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1997. For this dossier, Uralan, Plus and Moscow is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “football club” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 11, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q16677976. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2000, 2003 and 2002.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “FC Uralan Plus Moscow”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow FC Uralan Plus Moscow primary sources, FC Uralan Plus Moscow archive and Uralan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “FC Uralan Plus Moscow”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “FC Uralan Plus Moscow” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.