Extended Project Qualification
qualification taken by some students in the United Kingdom
Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) is a qualification taken by some students in England and Wales, which is equivalent to 50% of an A-level. Graded A*–E and worth up to 28 UCAS tariff points, it is part of level three of the national qualifications framework.
The extended project was devised by Sir Mike Tomlinson in 2006, during his review of 16- to 19-year-olds' education, and entered a pilot phase during the academic year 2007–8. It was a compulsory part of the 14–19 Diploma taken by students in England and Wales between 2008 and 2013.
Description
All students may take an extended project as a free-standing qualification, this following a 2009 recommendation by the examination boards of England and Wales (Edexcel, OCR, AQA, WJEC, Eduqas and CIE), and England's former qualifications authority, the QCA. By introducing EPQs it was hoped that students would be better prepared for study at university or begin a career, by developing skills in research, problem solving, critical thinking, writing, and independent learning.
There are few restrictions on the topic a student chooses, but it must be approved by the supervisor or institution and it must demonstrate that it either derives from one of the student's study areas or from an area of personal interest to the student. It takes the form of either a dissertation (5,000 words being a common guideline) or a number of other forms: a musical or dramatical composition, report or artefact, backed up with paperwork. According to the QCA, an extended project is "a single piece of work requiring a high degree of planning, preparation, research, and autonomous working."
David MacKay, head of the 14–19 curriculum at the QCA, was in favour of EPQs, saying in 2009: "Extended projects can help students to develop and demonstrate a range of valuable skills through pursuing their interests and investigating topics in more depth." It has also been praised by universities for guiding students into higher education (typically universities). Some universities will give a reduced conditional offer to a student who is undertaking an EPQ, or will recognise the EPQ as demonstrating a strong interest in a certain area.
The EPQ is equivalent to half an A-level and is graded from A* to E. The UCAS points awarded for the EPQ correspond to these grades as follows:
A* = 28 UCAS points
A = 24 UCAS points
B = 20 UCAS points
C = 16 UCAS points
D = 12 UCAS points
E = 8 UCAS points
Effect of the 2020 pandemic
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, in the summer of 2020 EPQ grades were awarded according to assessments made by teachers.
“Extended Project Qualification” enters the record as qualification taken by some students in the United Kingdom. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Extended, Project and Qualification can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Extended Project Qualification” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Extended, Project and Qualification provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5421841. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2013.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Extended Project Qualification”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Extended Project Qualification primary sources, Extended Project Qualification archive and Extended research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Extended Project Qualification”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Extended Project Qualification” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.