CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Explosively formed penetrator

shaped charge designed to penetrate armor effectively

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ1632676 ↗
Source-derived summary

An explosively formed penetrator (EFP) – also known as an explosively formed projectile, a self-forging warhead, or a self-forging fragment – is a special type of shaped charge relying on the Misnay–Schardin effect, designed to penetrate armour effectively, from a much greater standoff range than standard shaped charges, which are more limited by standoff distance. As the name suggests, the effect of the explosive charge is to deform a metal plate into a slug or rod shape and accelerate it toward a target. They were first developed as oil well perforators by American oil companies in the 1930s, and were deployed as weapons in World War II.

Difference from conventional shaped charges

A conventional shaped charge generally has a conical metal liner that is forced by an explosive blast into a hypervelocity jet of superplastic metal able to penetrate thick armour and knock out vehicles. A disadvantage of this arrangement is that the jet of metal loses effectiveness the further it travels, as it breaks up into disconnected particles that drift out of alignment.

An EFP operates on the same general principle, but its liner is designed to form not a jet of particles but a single compact, high-velocity projectile (commonly called the slug), permitting it to penetrate armour at greater distance: up to a hundred meters for a practical device. The liner is usually a thick, heavy plate of ductile metal such as copper, tantalum, iron or mild steel, having a plate/dish shape, or cone-shaped with an internal apex angle greater than 100°. The dish-shaped liner of an EFP can also generate a number of distinct projectile forms, depending on the shape of the plate and how the explosive is detonated. The high-explosive charge, pressed evenly against the convex side of the liner/plate, has approximately the same weight of the liner/plate. The concave side of the liner/plate is aimed at the target.

An EFP's penetration is more strongly affected by the density of its liner metal compared to a conventional shaped charge.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Explosively formed penetrator” as shaped charge designed to penetrate armor effectively. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 333-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Explosively, formed and penetrator can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as shaped charge designed to penetrate armor effectively. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1632676. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Explosively formed penetrator”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Explosively formed penetrator primary sources, Explosively formed penetrator archive and Explosively research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Explosively formed penetrator”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Explosively formed penetrator” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.