CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

peer-reviewed scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ5421212 ↗
Source-derived summary

Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a peer-reviewed medical journal publishing review articles and original papers on new pharmacotherapies. It is published by Informa and the editor-in-chief is Dimitri P. Mikhailidis (Royal Free Hospital).

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, and the Science Citation Index Expanded. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2016 impact factor of 3.894.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy” is peer-reviewed scientific journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Expert, Opinion and Pharmacotherapy, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2016—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1999-01-01. For this dossier, Expert, Opinion and Pharmacotherapy is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “peer-reviewed scientific journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5421212. 5 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2016.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy primary sources, Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy archive and Expert research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.