CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Experimental Gerontology

academic journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 29, 2023
Entity authorityQ15766996 ↗
Source-derived summary

Experimental Gerontology is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal covering biogerontology. It was established in 1964 and is published by Elsevier. The editor-in-chief is Christiaan Leeuwenburgh (University of Florida College of Medicine). According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2019 impact factor of 3.376.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Experimental Gerontology” as academic journal. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1964, 2019—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1964. The account is most persuasive where Experimental, Gerontology and academic can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as academic journal. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 29, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q15766996. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1964 and 2019.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Experimental Gerontology”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Experimental Gerontology primary sources, Experimental Gerontology archive and Experimental research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Experimental Gerontology”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Experimental Gerontology” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.