CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Exclu

encrypted messaging app

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ116796300
Source-derived summary

Exclu was an encrypted messaging app that was shut down after a series of international raids in February 2023.

Service

Exclu offered licences for three or six months, for €500 and €900 respectively.

History

In 2019 German police raided CyberBunker, which led to them obtaining data needed to decrypt the Exclu services. Data was shared with other police forces.

On 3 February 2023 simultaneous raids took place on properties in Germany, the Netherlands, Poland and Belgium. 48 people were arrested, including administrators, developers and users of Exclu.

Dutch police said that arrests were based on two distinct operations. The first, called 26Sambar, started in September 2020 and targeted owners and managers of Exclu. They were suspected of facilitating criminals. The second, called 26Lytham, began in late April 2022.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Exclu” as encrypted messaging app. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Exclu, encrypted and messaging.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023, 2019, 2020, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Exclu, encrypted and messaging providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Exclu”, the useful work is to connect “encrypted messaging app” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q116796300. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2023, 2019, 2020 and 2022.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Exclu”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Exclu primary sources, Exclu archive and Exclu research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Exclu”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Exclu” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.