CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Éva Biszku

Hungarian volleyball player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 14, 2025
Entity authorityQ61351648
Source-derived summary

Éva Biszku (born 17 March 1953) is a Hungarian volleyball player. She competed in the women's tournament at the 1976 Summer Olympics. Her twin sister, Zsuzsa, was also on the Hungarian volleyball team at the same Olympics.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Éva Biszku” as hungarian volleyball player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Biszku, Hungarian and volleyball.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1953, 1976—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1953-03-17. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Biszku, Hungarian and volleyball providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Éva Biszku”, the useful work is to connect “hungarian volleyball player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q61351648. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1953 and 1976.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Éva Biszku”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Éva Biszku primary sources, Éva Biszku archive and Biszku research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Éva Biszku”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Éva Biszku” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.