Lobatus
genus of molluscs

Lobatus is a genus of very large sea snails, marine gastropod mollusks in the family Strombidae, the true conchs. Some of the species within this genus were previously placed in the genus Eustrombus.
Species
Living and fossil species within the genus Lobatus include:
Lobatus peruvianus (Swainson, 1823)
Lobatus raninus (Gmelin, 1791)
†Lobatus dominator (Pilsbry, 1917)
†Lobatus galliformis (Pilsbry, 1917)
†Lobatus haitensis (Sowerby, 1850)
†Lobatus leidyi (Heilprin, 1887)
†Lobatus vokesae Landau et al., 2008
†Lobatus williamsi (Olson & Petit, 1964)
Species brought into synonymy include:
Lobatus costatus (Gmelin, 1791) accepted as Macrostrombus costatus (Gmelin, 1791)
Lobatus galeatus (Swainson, 1823) accepted as Titanostrombus galeatus (Swainson, 1823)
Lobatus gallus (Linnaeus, 1758) accepted as Aliger gallus (Linnaeus, 1758)
Lobatus gigas (Linnaeus, 1758) accepted as Aliger gigas (Linnaeus, 1758)
Lobatus goliath (Schröter, 1805) accepted as Titanostrombus goliath (Schröter, 1805)
Lobatus magolecciai (Macsotay & Campos, 2001) accepted as Lobatus raninus (Gmelin, 1791) (junior subjective synonym)
References
Further reading
George H. Darcy (September 1981). Annotated Bibliography of the Conch Genus Strombus (Gastropoda, Strombidae) in the Western Atlantic Ocean. NOAA TECHNICAL REPORT NMFS SSRF—748. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Malcolm Baldrlge, Secretary; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, John v. Byrne, Administrator; National Marine Fisheries Service.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Lobatus” is genus of molluscs. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Lobatus, genus and molluscs, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “genus of molluscs” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6663571. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1823, 1791, 1917 and 1850.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Lobatus”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Lobatus primary sources, Lobatus archive and Lobatus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lobatus”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Lobatus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.