CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Euskadi–Murias

cycling team

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ18416933 ↗
Source-derived summary

Euskadi–Murias was a Spanish UCI Professional Continental cycling team, that competed between 2015 and 2019. It was initially UCI Continental status, but upgraded to Pro Continental in 2018. Its sponsor was the Basque construction company Murias Group.

The team aimed to be the successor to Euskaltel–Euskadi as the leading professional team in Basque cycling.

Final team roster

As of 15 January 2019.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Euskadi–Murias” as cycling team. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Euskadi, Murias and cycling.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2019, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2015. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Euskadi, Murias and cycling providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Euskadi–Murias”, the useful work is to connect “cycling team” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18416933. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2019 and 2018.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Euskadi–Murias”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Euskadi–Murias primary sources, Euskadi–Murias archive and Euskadi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Euskadi–Murias”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Euskadi–Murias” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.