CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Bebearia brunhilda

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ4878331 ↗
Source-derived summary

Bebearia brunhilda is a butterfly in the family Nymphalidae. It is found in Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda and possibly Tanzania.

E. brunhilda Kirby. Under this name Kirby described as the male a form which seems to be identical with laetitia and as the female a species which is unknown to me. The description of the female is as follows: "Female tawny; anterior wings with the apical half brown, an irregular white blotch on the costa just beyond the middle, and a submarginal row of bluish-white spots, the larger ones centred with black, and the last of the series replaced by a black spot; posterior wings with a submarginal row of dusky markings, followed within by a row of obsolete dusky spots. Underside pinkish grey, with some indistinct annular markings in the cells, and the light markings of the upperside reproduced; a pale spot at the apex of the anterior wings, from below which a brown band curves inwards to the middle of the inner margin, and outwards across the middle of the posterior wings". This description is not adequate to differentiate the species with certainty from its allies. Cameroons.

E. iturina Karsch (41 b).[synonym] The male is dark yellow-brown or light chestnut-brown above and has the usual dark transverse bands narrow and continuous, only the fourth is almost completely broken up into rounded

spots; the distal margin of the forewing is moderately emarginate and the submarginal line of the hindwing strongly undulate or almost angled; under surface of the wings grey-brown; in the forewing the distal part

from the middle of the hindmargin to the apex is dark brown with the inner margin almost straight and encloses a transverse row of 5 slightly lighter, rounded, dark-pupilled spots posteriorly increasing in size; the inner boundary-line of this triangular dark brown distal border is proximally accompanied by an undulate dark brown line and the interspace between the two is filled up with dirty grey; hindwing beneath with two contiguous brown ring-spots in the cell, near the costal margin shortly before the middle of cellule 7 with a dirty white transverse spot and behind this with a washed-out brown arcuate band. In the female the apical part of the forewing from the middle of the costal margin to the hinder angle is blackish with a white subapical band composed of three spots in cellules 4—6 and thick white rings to the submarginal spots in cellules 2—4;the basal half of the forewing and the hindwing are yellow-brown with incomplete or indistinct black markings, only the submarginal line of the hindwing is sharply expressed, continuous and acutely angled; under surface lighter than in the male, greenish or yellowish grey with the same markings as in the male.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Bebearia brunhilda” as species of insect. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 456-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Bebearia, brunhilda and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of insect. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4878331. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Bebearia brunhilda”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Bebearia brunhilda primary sources, Bebearia brunhilda archive and Bebearia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Bebearia brunhilda”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Bebearia brunhilda” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.