CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Proxilodon

genus of the first four-limbed vertebrates and their descendants

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 12, 2025
Entity authorityQ16757765 ↗
Source-derived summary

Proxilodon is an extinct genus of recumbirostran microsaur from the Early Permian Speiser Formation of Kansas, United States. It contains a single species, Proxilodon bonneri, (formerly "Euryodus" bonneri).

History of study

There is only one known specimen of Proxilodon bonneri, the former holotype of Euryodus bonneri, named by Schultze & Foreman (1981). It was collected in 1976 by Brian Foreman from a roadcut site in Kansas in the lower Speiser Formation (often called the Speiser Shale) that preserves primarily aquatic vertebrates, such as the lungfish Gnathorhiza, the dvinosaur temnospondyl Acroplous vorax, the nectridean lepospondyl Diplocaulus, and the lysorophian Lysorophus tricarinatus. The species was named after Orville Bonner, who prepared the specimen, a complete skull with the left lower jaw in articulation and associated vertebrae and a fragmentary humerus. Huttenlocker et al. (2013) identified numerous differences from other species of Euryodus and erected the new genus Proxilodon, derived from a Latinized version of the Greek 'Euryodus,' which means 'broad-tooth' and which was the original taxonomic identification; 'proxilus' in Latin for broad/wide, and '-odon' refers to 'tooth.'

Anatomy

As with gymnarthrids like Euryodus, Proxilodon possesses a long postorbital region and a slightly convex occiput, but it also has a much narrower skull than is typical of Euryodus and a higher premaxillary tooth count, among other features, that differentiate it from gymnarthrids at large. Other features listed in the diagnosis include a small notch in the premaxilla that articulates with the nasal, a nasal longer than it is broad (in line with the generally narrow skull), and the absence of a pineal foramen, instead being replaced by a shallow fossa. The holotype skull is typically sized for 'microsaurs,' measuring slightly less than 19 mm in length. Most of the internal anatomy is obscured by the articulation with the skull.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Proxilodon” as genus of the first four-limbed vertebrates and their descendants. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Proxilodon, genus and first.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1981, 1976, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Proxilodon, genus and first providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Proxilodon”, the useful work is to connect “genus of the first four-limbed vertebrates and their descendants” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 12, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q16757765. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1981, 1976 and 2013.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Proxilodon”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Proxilodon primary sources, Proxilodon archive and Proxilodon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Proxilodon”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Proxilodon” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.