Eupoecilia
genus of insects
Eupoecilia is a genus of moths belonging to the subfamily Tortricinae of the family Tortricidae. It was described by Stephens in 1829.
Species
Eupoecilia aburica Razowski, 1993
Eupoecilia acrographa (Turner, 1916)
Eupoecilia ambiguella (Hübner, [1796])
Eupoecilia amphimnesta (Meyrick, 1928)
Eupoecilia anebrica Diakonoff, 1983
Eupoecilia angustana (Hübner, [1796-1799])
Eupoecilia anisoneura Diakonoff, 1982
Eupoecilia armifera Razowski, 1968
Eupoecilia cebrana (Hübner, [1811-1813])
Eupoecilia charixantha (Meyrick, 1928)
Eupoecilia citrinana Razowski, 1960
Eupoecilia coniopa Diakonoff, 1984
Eupoecilia cracens Diakonoff, 1982
Eupoecilia crocina Razowski, 1968
Eupoecilia dactylota (Diakonoff, 1952)
Eupoecilia dentana Razowski, 1968
Eupoecilia diana Razowski, 1968
Eupoecilia dynodesma (Diakonoff, 1971)
Eupoecilia engelinae (Diakonoff, 1941)
Eupoecilia eucalypta (Meyrick, 1928)
Eupoecilia inouei Kawabe, 1972
Eupoecilia kobeana Razowski, 1968
Eupoecilia kruegeriana Razowski, 1993
Eupoecilia lata Razowski, 1968
Eupoecilia neurosema (Meyrick, 1938)
Eupoecilia ochrotona Razowski, 1968
Eupoecilia quinaspinalis X.Zhang & H.H.Li, 2008
Eupoecilia reliquatrix (Meyrick, 1928)
Eupoecilia sanguisorbana (Herrich-Schäffer, 1856)
Eupoecilia scytalephora (Diakonoff, 1952)
Eupoecilia sumatrana Diakonoff, 1983
Eupoecilia sumbana (Diakonoff, 1953)
Eupoecilia taneces (Diakonoff, 1973)
Eupoecilia tenggerensis (Diakonoff, 1949)
Eupoecilia thalia Diakonoff, 1984
Eupoecilia wegneri (Diakonoff, 1941)
Eupoecilia yubariana Razowski, 2005
Synonyms
Arachniotes Diakonoff, 1952 (type species: Arachniotes dactylota Diakonoff, 1952)
Clysia Hübner, [1825] (type species: Tinea ambiguella Hübner, 1796 [preoccupied])
Clysiana T. B. Fletcher, 1941 [replacement name for Clysia]
Eupecilia Herrich-Schäffer, 1851 [misspelling of Eupoecilia]
See also
List of Tortricidae genera
References
Stephens, 1829, A Systematic Catalogue of British Insects (2): 190.
John W. Brown, 2005, World Catalogue of Insects 5
Razowski, J., 2011: Diagnoses and remarks on genera of Tortricidae, 2: Cochylini (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología 39 (156): 397–414.
“Eupoecilia” enters the record as genus of insects. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Eupoecilia, genus and insects can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Eupoecilia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Eupoecilia, genus and insects provides the most credible route into that argument.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 20, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1765523. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1829, 1993, 1916 and 1796.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Eupoecilia”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Eupoecilia primary sources, Eupoecilia archive and Eupoecilia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Eupoecilia”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Eupoecilia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.