Eugène Ehrhart
mathematician

Eugène Ehrhart (29 April 1906 – 17 January 2000) was a French mathematician who in the 1960s introduced Ehrhart polynomials, which count the lattice points in a polytope with integral vertices, their reciprocity property, and their generalization to rational polytopes. Ehrhart received his high school diploma at the age of 22. He was a mathematics teacher in several high schools, and did mathematics research on his own time. He started publishing in mathematics in his 40s, and finished his PhD thesis at the age of 60.
Selected publications
Ehrhart, Eugène (1967), "Démonstration de la loi de réciprocité du polyèdre rationnel", Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences de Paris, Sér. A-B 265, A91–A94.
Ehrhart, E. (1974), Polynômes arithmétiques et méthode des polyèdres en combinatoire, Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée, Strasbourg, 1974. Updated in: Ehrhart, E. (1977), Polynômes arithmétiques et méthode des polyèdres en combinatoire, International Series of Numerical Mathematics, Vol. 35. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel-Stuttgart, 1977.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Eugène Ehrhart” is mathematician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Eugène, Ehrhart and mathematician, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “mathematician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5408548. VIAF identifies the subject as 10400671. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1906, 2000, 1967 and 1974.
Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.
- Establishing names and roles
- Building a first chronology
- Locating cited institutions
Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Eugène Ehrhart”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Eugène Ehrhart primary sources, Eugène Ehrhart archive and Eugène research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Eugène Ehrhart”?
- Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
- Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Eugène Ehrhart” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.