CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Eugen Seydel

Austrian police chief (1879-1958)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 28, 2025
Entity authorityQ1372892 ↗
Source-derived summary

Eugen Seydel was an Austrian police chief in Vienna and president of the International Criminal Police Commission (ICPC - now known as Interpol) from 1934 to 1935. Seydel was born in Vienna in 1879 and died in 1958.

Career

In 1932, Seydel was appointed Vice President of the Vienna Police. From 20 March 1933 to 28 September 1934, he served as Police President, heading the Federal Police Directorate in Vienna. He subsequently held the position of President of the International Criminal Police Commission from 1934 to 1935. Seydel passed away in 1958 and was laid to rest in Meidling Cemetery in Vienna.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Eugen Seydel” as austrian police chief (1879-1958). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Eugen, Seydel and Austrian.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1934, 1935, 1879, 1958—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1879-10-20. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Eugen, Seydel and Austrian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Eugen Seydel”, the useful work is to connect “austrian police chief (1879-1958)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 28, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q1372892. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1934, 1935, 1879 and 1958.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Eugen Seydel”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Eugen Seydel primary sources, Eugen Seydel archive and Eugen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Eugen Seydel”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Eugen Seydel” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.