CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Corymbia aspera

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 25, 2024
Entity authorityQ15396220 ↗
Source-derived summary

Corymbia aspera, commonly known as rough-leaved ghost gum, rough leaf range gum, is a species of tree that is endemic to northern Australia. It has smooth white bark, sometimes with a short stocking of rough bark near the base, a crown of sessile juvenile, heart-shaped or egg-shaped leaves, flower buds in groups of seven, creamy white flowers and cup-shaped, barrel-shaped or cylindrical fruit.

Description

Corymbia aspera is a tree that typically grows to a height of 4 to 10 metres (13 to 33 ft), sometimes to 15 m (49 ft), and forms a lignotuber. It has smooth white, cream-coloured or grey bark, sometimes with flaky, tessellated bark at the base. The branchlets lack oil glands in the pith. Young plants and coppice regrowth have sessile, heart-shaped to egg-shaped leaves, 20–65 mm (0.79–2.56 in) long and 10–43 mm (0.39–1.69 in) wide arranged in opposite pairs. The crown consists of juvenile leaves that are sessile, the same shade of dull green to greyish on both sides, heart-shaped to egg-shaped, 15–68 mm (0.59–2.68 in) long and 7–35 mm (0.28–1.38 in) wide with the base stem-clasping or rounded. The flower buds are smooth, arranged in leaf axils on a branched peduncle up to 3 mm (0.12 in) long, each branch with seven buds on pedicels 2–7 mm (0.079–0.276 in) long. Mature buds are oval to pear-shaped, 3–5 mm (0.12–0.20 in) long and 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) wide with a shallow, flattened operculum. Flowering occurs from October to December and the flowers are white or creamy white.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Corymbia aspera” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Corymbia, aspera and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 252-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Corymbia, aspera and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Corymbia aspera”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 25, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q15396220. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Corymbia aspera”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Corymbia aspera primary sources, Corymbia aspera archive and Corymbia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Corymbia aspera”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Corymbia aspera” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.