CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

List of Sussex cricketers to 1838

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ126695918 ↗
Source-derived summary

This is an incomplete list of cricketers who played for Sussex before the foundation of the county club in March 1839.

Cricket is widely thought to have evolved from bat-and-ball games played by children in the south-east England counties of Kent and Sussex, particularly in the Weald and the North and South Downs. There are references to cricket in Sussex through the 17th century. In June 1697, the first known newspaper report about what was then called "a great match at cricket" concerned one in Sussex. It was played eleven-a-side for fifty guineas, a colossal sum at the time, indicating that two strong teams were assembled. While this may have been an historically important match, possibly between two county teams, the report is very brief, and details of the match itself were not included.

In the 1720s, more information was recorded, and among the known matches are those organised by the 2nd Duke of Richmond and Sir William Gage. Some of their matches were against each other, but they also opposed patrons from other counties, particularly Edwin Stead of Kent. One of the earliest great players was Thomas Waymark, noted for his "extraordinary agility and dexterity", who was employed by Richmond.

The first match known to involve a team called Sussex was against Kent at Walworth Common on 24 June 1729.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “List of Sussex cricketers to 1838” as wikimedia list article. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around List, Sussex and cricketers.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1839, 1697, 1729—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with List, Sussex and cricketers providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “List of Sussex cricketers to 1838”, the useful work is to connect “wikimedia list article” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q126695918. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1839, 1697 and 1729.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “List of Sussex cricketers to 1838”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow List of Sussex cricketers to 1838 primary sources, List of Sussex cricketers to 1838 archive and List research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “List of Sussex cricketers to 1838”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “List of Sussex cricketers to 1838” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.