CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Etemadi's inequality

probabilistic inequality on partial sum of finite collection of independent random variables

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 21, 2025
Entity authorityQ5402566
Source-derived summary

In probability theory, Etemadi's inequality is a so-called "maximal inequality", an inequality that gives a bound on the probability that the partial sums of a finite collection of independent random variables exceed some specified bound. The result is due to Nasrollah Etemadi.

Statement of the inequality

Let X1, ..., Xn be independent real-valued random variables defined on some common probability space, and let α ≥ 0. Let Sk denote the partial sum

S

k

=

X

1

+

+

X

k

.

{\displaystyle S_{k}=X_{1}+\cdots +X_{k}.\,}

Then

Pr

(

max

1

k

n

|

S

k

|

3

α

)

3

max

1

k

n

Pr

(

|

S

k

|

α

)

.

{\displaystyle \Pr {\Bigl (}\max _{1\leq k\leq n}|S_{k}|\geq 3\alpha {\Bigr )}\leq 3\max _{1\leq k\leq n}\Pr {\bigl (}|S_{k}|\geq \alpha {\bigr )}.}

Remark

Suppose that the random variables Xk have common expected value zero. Apply Chebyshev's inequality to the right-hand side of Etemadi's inequality and replace α by α / 3. The result is Kolmogorov's inequality with an extra factor of 27 on the right-hand side:

Pr

(

max

1

k

n

|

S

k

|

α

)

27

α

2

var

(

S

n

)

.

{\displaystyle \Pr {\Bigl (}\max _{1\leq k\leq n}|S_{k}|\geq \alpha {\Bigr )}\leq {\frac {27}{\alpha ^{2}}}\operatorname {var} (S_{n}).}

References

Billingsley, Patrick (1995). Probability and Measure.

Editorial summary

“Etemadi's inequality” enters the record as probabilistic inequality on partial sum of finite collection of independent random variables. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Etemadi's, inequality and probabilistic can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1995—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Etemadi's, inequality and probabilistic.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Etemadi's inequality” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Etemadi's, inequality and probabilistic provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5402566. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1995.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Etemadi's inequality”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Etemadi's inequality primary sources, Etemadi's inequality archive and Etemadi's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Etemadi's inequality”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Etemadi's inequality” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.