CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

State of Siege

1972 film by Costa-Gavras

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ1199755 ↗
Source-derived summary

State of Siege (French: État de siège) is a 1972 French–Italian–West German political thriller film directed by Costa-Gavras starring Yves Montand and Renato Salvatori. The story is based on the kidnapping and killing of Dan Mitrione, a USAID official, by Uruguayan Tupamaros in 1970.

Plot

After an extensive military and police operation, a body is found shot in a car. The deceased is Philip Michael Santore, an employee of the United States Agency for International Development. Santore, killed by the Tupamaros, is eulogized as an advocate for the poor at his state funeral. A tenacious leftist journalist, Carlos Ducas, wonders why the "communications consultant" Santore was targeted alongside higher-value victims.

In an extended flashback, Tupamaro guerrillas hijack several cars in order to kidnap the second secretary of the American Embassy (who is released), the Consul of Brazil, and Santore. Santore is treated well by his masked captors, who reveal through a calm interrogation that Santore actually worked as a sophisticated instructor of state terrorism and torture to officers of the Uruguayan, Brazilian, and Dominican dictatorships and acted as a liaison with anti-leftist death squads. Despite a massive operation, the Uruguayan military and police are unable to find the captives, and the government refuses a proposed prisoner exchange which would free them in return for the release of political prisoners.

After a large number of Tupamaros are captured by the police and their ultimatum goes unanswered, Santore's captors decide to kill him.

Editorial summary

“State of Siege” enters the record as 1972 film by Costa-Gavras. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what State, Siege and film can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972, 1970—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1972-12-30. Its strongest next move is a source search built around State, Siege and film.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“State of Siege” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, State, Siege and film provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1199755. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1972 and 1970.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “State of Siege”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow State of Siege primary sources, State of Siege archive and State research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “State of Siege”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “State of Siege” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.