CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Escadrille 73

military unit

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ16975009
Source-derived summary

Escadrille 73 of the French Air Force originated at Corcieux on 23 May 1915 as Detachment N 49 during the World War I.

History

It was initially assigned to the VII Armee front. On 1 April 1916, it was renamed Detachment Nieuport de Corcieux. On 18 April 1916, it was redesignated, this time as Detachment N73. It became Escadrille N73 on 4 July 1916. On 1 November 1916, it was one of the units gathered into Groupe de Combat 12, along with Escadrille N3, Escadrille N26, and Escadrille N103. The unit became Escadrille Spa73 when it re-equipped with Spad VIIs in January 1917. The escadrille left GC 12 on 18 January 1918, being replaced by Escadrille SPA.67. On 4 October 1918, Escadrille Spa73 was cited in orders as having downed 30 enemy aircraft and an observation balloon.

Commanding officers

Lieutenant Pierre Bouny

Lieutenant Honore Lareinty-Tholozan: Killed in flying accident 5 May 1916

Unknown

Lieutenant Jean Ricard: 4 July 1916 –

Capitaine Albert Deullin: 22 February 1917 – 8 February 1918

Capitaine Pierre Cahuzac: ca 9 February 1918 – ca 2 March 1918

Lieutenant Maurice Noguès: 3 March 1918 – April 1918

Lieutenant Robert Gerdes: April 1918 – ca 9 July 1918

Lieutenant Pierre Jaille: 10 July 1918 – ?

Notable personnel

Capitaine Albert Deullin

Lieutenant François Battesti

Aircraft

Nieuport

Nieuport 24

Spad VII: Received January 1917

Endnotes

References

Franks, Norman; Frank W. Bailey.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Escadrille 73” as military unit. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1915, 1916, 1917, 1918—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Escadrille, military and unit can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as military unit. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q16975009. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1915, 1916, 1917 and 1918.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Escadrille 73”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Escadrille 73 primary sources, Escadrille 73 archive and Escadrille research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Escadrille 73”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Escadrille 73” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.