CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ernst Vogt

German classical philologist (1930–2017)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ1360440 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ernst Vogt (6 November 1930 – 9 August 2017) was a German classical philologist. He was a professor at the University of Mannheim (1967–1975) and LMU Munich (1975–1999). Between 2002 and 2014 he served president of the International Thesaurus Commission.

Vogt engaged with the history of literary forms and genres, with Greek literature of the Hellenistic and Roman Empire periods, with the history of how classical literature was delivered and received, and with the history of classical philology.

Biography

Ernst Walter Siegfried Vogt was born and grew up in Duisburg, a dynamic commercial and manufacturing center which at that time (as now) was home to one of the world's largest inland ports. His father was a lawyer. He successfully completed his schooling at the city's Landfermann-Gymnasium (secondary school) and then, in 1950, moved on to study classical philology, archeology and philosophy, upriver at the University of Bonn. His student career at Bonn lasted until 1956, during which time the scope of his studies also covered papyrology and language sciences. In 1951/52, he spent a year at the University of Tübingen. He also received a DAAD scholarship which enabled him to spend a year in Athens.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Ernst Vogt” as german classical philologist (1930–2017). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Ernst, Vogt and German.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1930, 2017, 1967, 1975—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1930-11-06, 1930-06-11—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Ernst, Vogt and German providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ernst Vogt”, the useful work is to connect “german classical philologist (1930–2017)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1360440. VIAF identifies the subject as 12429096. The Library of Congress control number is n82154666. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1930, 2017, 1967 and 1975.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ernst Vogt”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ernst Vogt primary sources, Ernst Vogt archive and Ernst research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ernst Vogt”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ernst Vogt” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.