CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ernest Arthur Edghill

American academic (1879-1912)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ5392740 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ernest Arthur Edghill (3 February 1879, Gibraltar – 23 August 1912), B.D., was an Anglican priest and theological writer. He was the Hulsean Lecturer at Cambridge 1910–11, and Lecturer in Ecclesiastical History at King's College London.

Ernest Arthur Edghill was educated at Eton and King's College, Cambridge, where he studied theology.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Ernest Arthur Edghill” is american academic (1879-1912). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Ernest, Arthur and Edghill, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1879, 1912, 1910—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1879-02-03. For this dossier, Ernest, Arthur and Edghill is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american academic (1879-1912)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5392740. VIAF identifies the subject as 5302791. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1879, 1912 and 1910.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ernest Arthur Edghill”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ernest Arthur Edghill primary sources, Ernest Arthur Edghill archive and Ernest research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ernest Arthur Edghill”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ernest Arthur Edghill” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.