Erissus
genus of arachnids

Erissus is a genus of South American crab spiders that was first described by Eugène Louis Simon in 1895.
Species
As of September 2020 it contains ten species, found in Venezuela, Peru, and Brazil:
Erissus angulosus Simon, 1895 – Brazil
Erissus bateae Soares, 1941 – Brazil
Erissus bilineatus Mello-Leitão, 1929 – Brazil
Erissus fuscus Simon, 1929 – Peru, Brazil
Erissus mirabilis (Soares, 1942) – Brazil
Erissus roseus Mello-Leitão, 1943 – Brazil
Erissus sanctaeleopoldinae (Soares & Soares, 1946) – Brazil
Erissus spinosissimus Mello-Leitão, 1929 – Brazil
Erissus truncatifrons Simon, 1895 – Venezuela, Brazil
Erissus validus Simon, 1895 (type) – Peru, Brazil
See also
List of Thomisidae species
References
Further reading
Mello-Leitão, C. F. de (1929). "Aphantochilidas e Thomisidas do Brasil". Arquivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro. 31: 9–359.
Bonaldo, A. B.; Lise, A. A. (2001). "A review of the Neotropical spider genus Stephanopoides (Araneae, Thomisidae, Stephanopinae)". Biociências. 9: 63–80.
Soares, B. A. M.; Soares, H. E. M. (1946).
The public source identifies “Erissus” as genus of arachnids. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Erissus, genus and arachnids.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Erissus”, the useful work is to connect “genus of arachnids” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5308561. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1895, 2020, 1941 and 1929.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Erissus”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Erissus primary sources, Erissus archive and Erissus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Erissus”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Erissus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.