CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Eric Pacey

lacrosse player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 30, 2025
Entity authorityQ5387232
Source-derived summary

Eric Pacey (born May 3, 1978 in Toronto, Ontario) was a professional lacrosse player for the Minnesota Swarm of the National Lacrosse League. He was acquired in a trade with the Toronto Rock prior to the 2005 season and served as the assistant captain of the Swarm for five seasons. He also played junior hockey for the London Knights of the Ontario Hockey League and at York University.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Eric Pacey” as lacrosse player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Eric, Pacey and lacrosse.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1978, 2005—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1978-05-03. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Eric, Pacey and lacrosse providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Eric Pacey”, the useful work is to connect “lacrosse player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 30, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5387232. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1978 and 2005.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Eric Pacey”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Eric Pacey primary sources, Eric Pacey archive and Eric research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Eric Pacey”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Eric Pacey” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.