CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Erelieva quantulella

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 11, 2025
Entity authorityQ5385421 ↗
Source-derived summary

Erelieva quantulella is a species of snout moth. It was described by George Duryea Hulst in 1887. It is found in the south-eastern United States.

Editorial summary

“Erelieva quantulella” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Erelieva, quantulella and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1887—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Erelieva, quantulella and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Erelieva quantulella” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Erelieva, quantulella and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 11, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5385421. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1887.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Erelieva quantulella”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Erelieva quantulella primary sources, Erelieva quantulella archive and Erelieva research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Erelieva quantulella”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Erelieva quantulella” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.