Erdős–Anning theorem
infinite set of points in R2 with mutual integer distances must be a straight line

The Erdős–Anning theorem states that, whenever an infinite number of points in the plane all have integer distances, the points lie on a straight line. The same result holds in higher dimensional Euclidean spaces.
The theorem cannot be strengthened to give a finite bound on the number of points: there exist arbitrarily large finite sets of points that are not on a line and have integer distances.
The theorem is named after Paul Erdős and Norman H. Anning, who published a proof of it in 1945. Erdős later supplied a simpler proof, which can also be used to check whether a point set forms an Erdős–Diophantine graph, an inextensible system of integer points with integer distances. The Erdős–Anning theorem inspired the Erdős–Ulam problem on the existence of dense point sets with rational distances. Some later publications credit the same result to Gustave Choquet and Germain Kreweras. It was independently rediscovered, with an application to the design of phased arrays, by B. Gleijeses in 1981.
Rationality versus integrality
Although there can be no infinite non-collinear set of points with integer distances, there are infinite non-collinear sets of points whose distances are rational numbers. For instance, the subset of points on a unit circle obtained as the even multiples of one of the acute angles of an integer-sided right triangle (such as the triangle with side lengths 3, 4, and 5) has this property.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Erdős–Anning theorem” as infinite set of points in R2 with mutual integer distances must be a straight line. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as infinite set of points in R2 with mutual integer distances must be a straight line. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3526982. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1945 and 1981.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Erdős–Anning theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Erdős–Anning theorem primary sources, Erdős–Anning theorem archive and Erdős research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Erdős–Anning theorem”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Erdős–Anning theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.