CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Enterobacterial common antigen

class of chemical compounds

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ55710195 ↗
Source-derived summary

The enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) is a carbohydrate antigen found in the outer membrane of many Enterobacterales species. The antigen is unanimously absent from other gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Aeromonas hydrophila 209A is the only organism outside of Enterobacterales that expresses the ECA. More studies are needed to explain the presence of the antigen in this species as no other strains of this species express the antigen. The ECA is a polysaccharide made of repeating units of trisaccharides. The functions of these units have very few proven functions. Some evidence indicates role in pathogenicity in the bacteria that present the ECA. There are three separate types of ECA these include ECAPG, ECALPS, and ECACYC, each have different lengths. The synthesis of the ECA is controlled by the wec operon and has a 12-step synthesis which is described below. Due to the lack of proven function of the ECA, any clinical significance is hard to define however, some evidence suggests that human serum has antibodies against ECA.

History

The ECA was first described in 1962 in a paper written by Calvin M. Kunin and colleagues. When documenting strains of E. coli responsible for urinary tract infections, Kunin exposed these E. coli strains to rabbit antisera and various other E. coli strains (102 homologous and heterologous strains). Using passive agglutination, Kunin detected the O-antigen found in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of E. coli.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Enterobacterial common antigen” as class of chemical compounds. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Enterobacterial, common and antigen.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1962—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Enterobacterial, common and antigen providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Enterobacterial common antigen”, the useful work is to connect “class of chemical compounds” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q55710195. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1962.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Enterobacterial common antigen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Enterobacterial common antigen primary sources, Enterobacterial common antigen archive and Enterobacterial research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Enterobacterial common antigen”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Enterobacterial common antigen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.