CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Engagement for Citizenship and Development

opposition party in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ139073657 ↗
Source-derived summary

Engagement for Citizenship and Development (French: Engagement pour la Citoyenneté et le Développement, ECIDE) is a political party in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The party was founded in 2009 and is led by its founder Martin Fayulu.

History

Founding

The party was formed in 2009 by businessman and oil executive Martin Fayulu, who had been elected as Member of the National Assembly in 2006. The party won two seats in the National Assembly in the 2011 Democratic Republic of the Congo general election.

2018 elections

In 2018, the party was one of the founding members of the Lamuka coalition, that promised to unite the opposition in advance of the 2018 Democratic Republic of the Congo general election. Infighting lead to multiple opposition leaders, including Félix Tshisekedi, leaving the coalition. The party ran under the label Dynamic of the Opposition in the 2018 election. According to officially published results, its leader Martin Fayulu finished second in the presidential elections behind Félix Tshisekedi. Independent observers, including the Episcopal Conference of the Democratic Republic of the Congo claim that Fayulu won the elections. Fayulu proclaimed himself victor of the presidential elections and called on his supporters to protest against the official results.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Engagement for Citizenship and Development” is opposition party in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Engagement, Citizenship and Development, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2006, 2011, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Engagement, Citizenship and Development is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “opposition party in the Democratic Republic of the Congo” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q139073657. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2006, 2011 and 2018.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Engagement for Citizenship and Development”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Engagement for Citizenship and Development primary sources, Engagement for Citizenship and Development archive and Engagement research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Engagement for Citizenship and Development”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Engagement for Citizenship and Development” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.