Endocrine Reviews
peer-reviewed scientific journal
Endocrine Reviews is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal for review articles in endocrinology published by the Endocrine Society. The current editor-in-chief is Ashley Grossman, MD. Its 2023 impact factor is 22.
Endocrine Reviews publishes authoritative review articles spanning experimental and clinical endocrinology. The Editors of Endocrine Reviews consider topics on emerging and established clinical research as well as advances in endocrine science emanating from studies of cell biology, immunology, pharmacology, genetics, molecular biology, neuroscience, reproductive medicine, and pediatric endocrinology.
The public source identifies “Endocrine Reviews” as peer-reviewed scientific journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Endocrine, Reviews and peer-reviewed.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Endocrine Reviews”, the useful work is to connect “peer-reviewed scientific journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 21, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3054007. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2023.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Endocrine Reviews”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Endocrine Reviews primary sources, Endocrine Reviews archive and Endocrine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Endocrine Reviews”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Endocrine Reviews” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.