CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Emma Cooke

American archer (1848–1929)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ442867
Source-derived summary

Emma C. Cooke (September 7, 1848 – January 22, 1929) was an American archer who competed in the early twentieth century. She was born in Fayetteville, Pennsylvania. Cooke won two silver medals in Archery at the 1904 Summer Olympics in Missouri in the double national and Columbia rounds behind Matilda Howell.

Editorial summary

“Emma Cooke” enters the record as american archer (1848–1929). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Emma, Cooke and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1848, 1929, 1904—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1848-09-07. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Emma, Cooke and American.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Emma Cooke” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Emma, Cooke and American provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q442867. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1848, 1929 and 1904.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Emma Cooke”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Emma Cooke primary sources, Emma Cooke archive and Emma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Emma Cooke”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Emma Cooke” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.