CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Emily Newton Dunn

British television presenter

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ5372302 ↗
Source-derived summary

Emily Newton Dunn (born 1972) is an English television presenter, video game designer, and producer.

Career

She co-presented the Channel 4 TV programme Bits with Aleks Krotoski and Emily Booth. Since leaving television presenting, she began working in her video games career for Criterion Games. She later worked for Electronic Arts as part of EA Bright Light as both a designer and producer, working on games such as Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Emily Newton Dunn” is british television presenter. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Emily, Newton and Dunn, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive route into publication, performance and collection histories when the underlying object or edition remains clearly identified. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1972-01-01. For this dossier, Emily, Newton and Dunn is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “british television presenter” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5372302. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1972.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Emily Newton Dunn”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Emily Newton Dunn primary sources, Emily Newton Dunn archive and Emily research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Emily Newton Dunn”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Emily Newton Dunn” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.