Ellingston Special
American variable-geometry aircraft
The Ellingston Special was a variable-geometry aircraft, designed by Cornwallis "Con" Ellingston of Great Falls, Montana in the late 1930s.
Background
Ellingston, together with Earle Hansen, constructed the aircraft, with Hansen making the maiden flight on April 23, 1938. It was a single-seat low-wing monoplane, fitted with a retractable undercarriage, and was powered by a 70 hp (52 kW) LeBlond 90-7D radial engine, fitted with a two-bladed tractor propeller. The primary structure was constructed from 4130 chromoly steel tubing.
The aircraft's most notable feature was its telescopic wings, which could vary in span between 25 ft (7.6 m) and 32 ft (9.8 m), with it being possible to vary the wingspan while in flight. The maximum speed of the aircraft varied from 165 mph (266 km/h) with the wings retracted, to 110 mph (180 km/h) with the wings extended.
An article in the December 1939 issue of Popular Aviation magazine stated that Ellingston was working on a twin-engined transport aircraft, which would also incorporate variable span, construction of which was scheduled to begin that winter.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Ellingston Special” is american variable-geometry aircraft. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Ellingston, Special and American, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “american variable-geometry aircraft” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q120487883. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1938 and 1939.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Ellingston Special”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Ellingston Special primary sources, Ellingston Special archive and Ellingston research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ellingston Special”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Ellingston Special” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.