CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Elizabeth Ann Classic

golf tournament on Ladies European Tour

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ18649105 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Elizabeth Ann Classic was a women's professional golf tournament on the Ladies European Tour held near Leeds in England.

History

The Elizabeth Ann Classic was played in 1980 and 1981 at Pannal Golf Club, in Pannal near Harrogate, 13 miles (21 km) north of Leeds.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Elizabeth Ann Classic” as golf tournament on Ladies European Tour. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Elizabeth, Classic and golf.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1980, 1981—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Elizabeth, Classic and golf providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Elizabeth Ann Classic”, the useful work is to connect “golf tournament on Ladies European Tour” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18649105. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1980 and 1981.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Elizabeth Ann Classic”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Elizabeth Ann Classic primary sources, Elizabeth Ann Classic archive and Elizabeth research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Elizabeth Ann Classic”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Elizabeth Ann Classic” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.