CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Elias Bruneti of Bergerac

French theologian

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 14, 2025
Entity authorityQ5360462 ↗
Source-derived summary

Elias Bruneti of Bergerac (Elias Bruneti de Brageriaco) was a Dominican master of theology in the 13th century. According to Kaeppeli, he lectured in Montpellier in the years 1246 through 1247. Later, he became the regent master of the Dominicans in Paris around the years 1248–1256.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Elias Bruneti of Bergerac” as french theologian. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1246, 1247, 1248, 1256—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1201. The account is most persuasive where Elias, Bruneti and Bergerac can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as french theologian. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5360462. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1246, 1247, 1248 and 1256.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Elias Bruneti of Bergerac”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Elias Bruneti of Bergerac primary sources, Elias Bruneti of Bergerac archive and Elias research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Elias Bruneti of Bergerac”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Elias Bruneti of Bergerac” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.