CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Electoral results for the Division of Forrest

Australian division election results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 16, 2025
Entity authorityQ5356528 ↗
Source-derived summary

This is a list of electoral results for the Division of Forrest in Australian federal elections from the division's creation in 1922 until the present.

Members

Election results

Elections in the 2020s

2025

2022

Elections in the 2010s

2019

2016

2013

2010

Elections in the 2000s

2007

2004

2001

Elections in the 1990s

1998

1996

1993

1990

Elections in the 1980s

1987

1984

1983

1980

Elections in the 1970s

1977

1975

1974

1972

Elections in the 1960s

1969

1966

1963

1961

Elections in the 1950s

1958

1955

1954

1951

Elections in the 1940s

1949

1946

1943

1940

Elections in the 1930s

1937

1934

1931

Elections in the 1920s

1929

1928

1925

1922

References

Australian Electoral Commission. Federal election results

Carr, Adam.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Electoral results for the Division of Forrest” is australian division election results. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Electoral, results and Division, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1922, 2025, 2022, 2019—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Electoral, results and Division is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “australian division election results” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 16, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5356528. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1922, 2025, 2022 and 2019.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Electoral results for the Division of Forrest”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Electoral results for the Division of Forrest primary sources, Electoral results for the Division of Forrest archive and Electoral research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Electoral results for the Division of Forrest”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Electoral results for the Division of Forrest” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.