CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Elaine Baker

Australian marine geoscientist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 29, 2025
Entity authorityQ106292312
Source-derived summary

Elaine Baker holds the UNESCO Chair in Marine Science at the University of Sydney. She was the director of the University of Sydney Marine Studies Institute from 2015 to 2020. Her position is supported by GRID-Arendal, a centre collaborating with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

Early life and education

Elaine Baker was born in Melbourne, Victoria, and attended MLC Hawthorn and Clyde Woodend.

She holds a BSc (Hons) ] and a PhD from the University of Sydney, where she has been employed for more than 30 years.

Career and impact

Elaine has worked at the University of Sydney since 1987. She has been involved in numerous high profile international projects including United Nations Environment Programme's (UNEP) Continental Shelf Programme, (CSP) that resulted from United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The aim of the CSP is to assist developing countries and smaller island nations in securing their rights to extended territorial limits under the third UNCLOS convention. In order to claim extended continental shelf limits, states need to collect and provide extensive technical geographical data. Under the programme, GRID (Global Resource Information Database) centers provide technical and expert support to these states in collecting the geospatial, marine geophysical and geological data needed for submissions under UNCLOS. The GRID-Arendal center coordinates the CSP globally.

Editorial summary

“Elaine Baker” enters the record as australian marine geoscientist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Elaine, Baker and Australian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2015, 2020, 1987—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1957. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Elaine, Baker and Australian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Elaine Baker” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Elaine, Baker and Australian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q106292312. VIAF identifies the subject as 1426160606861816300000. The Library of Congress control number is no2012081495. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2015, 2020 and 1987.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Elaine Baker”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Elaine Baker primary sources, Elaine Baker archive and Elaine research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Elaine Baker”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Elaine Baker” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.