CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ruwer/Eitelsbach

human settlement in Germany

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ316811 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ruwer/Eitelsbach is a quarter of Trier, Germany.

Eitelsbach was a small village at the Ruwer (river) in Germany's Mosel region and famous for the wine estate Karthäuserhof and the associated vineyard Karthäuserhofberg, which means "Carthusians' Hill". The wines are labeled "Eitelsbacher Karthäuserhofberger."

Eitelsbach and Ruwer were added to Trier in 1969. They formed the Trier district of Ruwer/Eitelsbach in 1974.

Editorial summary

“Ruwer/Eitelsbach” enters the record as human settlement in Germany. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ruwer, Eitelsbach and human can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1969, 1974—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Ruwer, Eitelsbach and human.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ruwer/Eitelsbach” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ruwer, Eitelsbach and human provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q316811. VIAF identifies the subject as 243881208. Authority coordinates are 49.786, 6.710. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1969 and 1974.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ruwer/Eitelsbach”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ruwer/Eitelsbach primary sources, Ruwer/Eitelsbach archive and Ruwer research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ruwer/Eitelsbach”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ruwer/Eitelsbach” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.