Eilenberg–Ganea theorem
Open-knowledge reference entry

In mathematics, particularly in homological algebra and algebraic topology, the Eilenberg–Ganea theorem states for every finitely generated group G with certain conditions on its cohomological dimension (namely
3
≤
cd
(
G
)
≤
n
{\displaystyle 3\leq \operatorname {cd} (G)\leq n}
), one can construct an aspherical CW complex X of dimension n whose fundamental group is G. The theorem is named after Polish mathematician Samuel Eilenberg and Romanian mathematician Tudor Ganea. The theorem was first published in a short paper in 1957 in the Annals of Mathematics.
Definitions
Group cohomology: Let
G
{\displaystyle G}
be a group and let
X
=
K
(
G
,
1
)
{\displaystyle X=K(G,1)}
be the corresponding Eilenberg−MacLane space. Then we have the following singular chain complex which is a free resolution of
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
over the group ring
Z
[
G
]
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [G]}
(where
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
is a trivial
Z
[
G
]
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [G]}
-module):
⋯
→
δ
n
+
1
C
n
(
E
)
→
δ
n
C
n
−
1
(
E
)
→
⋯
→
C
1
(
E
)
→
δ
1
C
0
(
E
)
→
ε
Z
→
0
,
{\displaystyle \cdots \xrightarrow {\delta _{n}+1} C_{n}(E)\xrightarrow {\delta _{n}} C_{n-1}(E)\rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow C_{1}(E)\xrightarrow {\delta _{1}} C_{0}(E)\xrightarrow {\varepsilon } \mathbb {Z} \rightarrow 0,}
where
E
{\displaystyle E}
is the universal cover of
X
{\displaystyle X}
and
C
k
(
E
)
{\displaystyle C_{k}(E)}
is the free abelian group generated by the singular
k
{\displaystyle k}
-chains on
E
{\displaystyle E}
. The group cohomology of the group
G
{\displaystyle G}
with coefficient in a
Z
[
G
]
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [G]}
-module
M
{\displaystyle M}
is the cohomology of this chain complex with coefficients in
M
{\displaystyle M}
, and is denoted by
H
∗
(
G
,
M
)
{\displaystyle H^{*}(G,M)}
.
Cohomological dimension: A group
G
{\displaystyle G}
has cohomological dimension
n
{\displaystyle n}
with coefficients in
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
(denoted by
cd
Z
(
G
)
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cd} _{\mathbb {Z} }(G)}
) if
n
=
sup
{
k
:
There exists a
Z
[
G
]
module
M
with
H
k
(
G
,
M
)
≠
0
}
.
{\displaystyle n=\sup\{k:{\text{There exists a }}\mathbb {Z} [G]{\text{ module }}M{\text{ with }}H^{k}(G,M)\neq 0\}.}
Fact: If
G
{\displaystyle G}
has a projective resolution of length at most
n
{\displaystyle n}
, i.e.,
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
as trivial
Z
[
G
]
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [G]}
module has a projective resolution of length at most
n
{\displaystyle n}
if and only if
H
Z
i
(
G
,
M
)
=
0
{\displaystyle H_{\mathbb {Z} }^{i}(G,M)=0}
for all
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
-modules
M
{\displaystyle M}
and for all
i
>
n
{\displaystyle i>n}
.
Therefore, we have an alternative definition of cohomological dimension as follows,
The cohomological dimension of G with coefficient in
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
is the smallest n (possibly infinity) such that G has a projective resolution of length n, i.e.,
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
has a projective resolution of length n as a trivial
Z
[
G
]
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} [G]}
module.
Eilenberg−Ganea theorem
Let
G
{\displaystyle G}
be a finitely presented group and
n
≥
3
{\displaystyle n\geq 3}
be an integer. Suppose the cohomological dimension of
G
{\displaystyle G}
with coefficients in
Z
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} }
is at most
n
{\displaystyle n}
, i.e.,
cd
Z
(
G
)
≤
n
{\displaystyle \operatorname {cd} _{\mathbb {Z} }(G)\leq n}
.
“Eilenberg–Ganea theorem” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Eilenberg, Ganea and theorem can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Eilenberg–Ganea theorem” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Eilenberg, Ganea and theorem provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5349488. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1957.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Eilenberg–Ganea theorem”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Eilenberg–Ganea theorem primary sources, Eilenberg–Ganea theorem archive and Eilenberg research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Eilenberg–Ganea theorem”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Eilenberg–Ganea theorem” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.