CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

I Am that I Am

Yahweh's answer to Moses upon being asked for his name in Exodus 3:14

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ3307521
Source-derived summary

"I Am that I Am" is a common English translation of the Hebrew phrase אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה (’ehye ’ăšer ’ehye; pronounced [ʔehˈje ʔaˈʃer ʔehˈje]), which appears in the Hebrew Bible (book of Exodus 3:14). The phrase is also translated as "I am who I am", "I am that (I) am", "I will become what I choose to become", "I am what I am", "I will be what I will be", "I create what(ever) I create", or "I am the Existing One".

Etymology

אֶהְיֶה אֲשֶׁר אֶהְיֶה (’ehye ’ăšer ’ehye) is the first of three responses given to Moses when he asks for God's name in Exodus 3:13-15. The word אֶהְיֶה (’Ehyeh) is the first person singular imperfective form of הָיָה (hayah), 'to be', and owing to the peculiarities of Hebrew grammar can mean both 'I am' and 'I will be'. The meaning of the longer phrase ’ehyeh ’ăšer ’ehyeh is debated, and might be seen as a promise ('I will be with you') or as statement of incomparability ('I am without equal').

Grammatical tense in Biblical Hebrew was purely aspectual rather than temporal; that is to say, verbs did not morphologically indicate when they happened, only whether they were complete. The perfect tense denoted any actions that have been completed, and imperfect denoted any actions that are not yet completed. Additionally, if a verb form was prefixed by וַ- (wa-), its aspect was inverted; a verb conjugated in the imperfect and prefixed by וַ- would read as the perfect, while a verb conjugated in the perfect and prefixed by וַ- would read as the imperfect. The word אֶהְיֶה (ehyeh) is the first-person singular imperfect form of hayah, 'to be', which in Modern Hebrew indicates the future tense 'I will be'; however, it lacks the prefix וַ- which would necessitate this reading in Biblical Hebrew.

In English, it is necessary to attach a time to a verb, so ehyeh must be forced into one possible meaning in translation.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “I Am that I Am” is yahweh's answer to Moses upon being asked for his name in Exodus 3:14. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Yahweh's, answer and Moses, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 326-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Yahweh's, answer and Moses is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “yahweh's answer to Moses upon being asked for his name in Exodus 3:14” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3307521. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “I Am that I Am”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow I Am that I Am primary sources, I Am that I Am archive and Yahweh's research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “I Am that I Am”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from I Am that I Am” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.