CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Edwards Lifesciences

American medical technology company

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ16966841 ↗
Source-derived summary

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in tissue heart valves and transcatheter technologies for the treatment of structural heart disease. The company has manufacturing facilities at the Irvine headquarters, as well as in Draper, Utah; Costa Rica; Singapore; and Limerick, Ireland. The company is also constructing a manufacturing plant in Moncada, near Valencia, Spain, with a €150 million investment. Production is scheduled to begin in 2027.

History

Edwards Lifesciences was originally founded by electrical engineer Miles "Lowell" Edwards in 1958, a graduate of Oregon State University. Edwards invented the first medically proven and adopted artificial heart valve. Dr. Albert Starr, a surgeon at the Oregon Health and Sciences University, is credited as the first to successfully implant the Starr-Edwards mitral valve in a patient in 1960. As a result of the successful heart implant, Edwards established manufacturing in Santa Ana, California the same year to continue his research in pulmonary devices.

Edwards' valves are still in operation today.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Edwards Lifesciences” is american medical technology company. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Edwards, Lifesciences and American, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2027, 1958, 1960—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1956, 1958—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. For this dossier, Edwards, Lifesciences and American is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american medical technology company” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16966841. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2027, 1958 and 1960.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Edwards Lifesciences”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Edwards Lifesciences primary sources, Edwards Lifesciences archive and Edwards research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Edwards Lifesciences”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Edwards Lifesciences” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.