Edward Sclater
English clergyman and Roman Catholic convert
Edward Sclater (3 November 1623 – 1688 or 1689) was a Church of England priest, notable for his brief conversion to Roman Catholicism.
Life
Studying at Merchant Taylors School and St John's College, Oxford, he graduated BA in 1644 and formed part of Oxford's Royalist garrison during the English Civil War. The Parliamentarian regime ejected him from his college in 1648 and he retired to a curacy in Berkshire, where he refused to take the 1649 'engagement'. He wrote to Charles II of England after the Restoration detailing his perceived persecution under the Commonwealth and gained an appointment as perpetual curate of St Mary's Church, Putney and the living of Esher, Surrey. When Charles' brother James II succeeded to the throne, Sclater converted to Roman Catholicism and in 1686 published Nubes Testium, or a Collection of the Primitive Fathers and Consensus Veterum, or the Reasons of Edw. Sclater, Minister of Putney, for his Conversion to the Catholic Faith and Communion to justify this decision. The same year James granted him special dispensation to retain both his livings at Putney and Esher, to take on a curate, to run at least one school and to receive "boarders, tablers, or sojourners"
Sclater's books were attacked by Edward Gee in Veteres Vindicati (1687) and An Answer to the Compiler of the Nubes Testium (1688) and upon the Glorious Revolution of 1689 he publicly recanted at the Savoy Chapel and was received back into the Church of England - Anthony Horneck wrote an account of the recantation. Sclater retired from his school and his livings to live as a private individual near 'Exeter Change' in London. He had two sons:
Edward (1655–1710); fellow and bursar of Merton College, Oxford; rector of Gamlingay, Cambridgeshire (1685-1710); frequently mentioned in Wood's Life and Times.
George; rector of Hayes in 1688, and Westerham, Kent, in 1696.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Edward Sclater” is english clergyman and Roman Catholic convert. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Edward, Sclater and English, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “english clergyman and Roman Catholic convert” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18528376. VIAF identifies the subject as 5275122. The Library of Congress control number is n84177197. 1 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1623, 1688, 1689 and 1644.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Edward Sclater”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Edward Sclater primary sources, Edward Sclater archive and Edward research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Edward Sclater”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Edward Sclater” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.