CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Edward Feser

American professor of philosophy

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ15429164
Source-derived summary

Edward Charles Feser () is an American Catholic philosopher. He is a professor of Philosophy at Pasadena City College in Pasadena, California.

Early life and education

Edward Charles Feser holds a B.A. in philosophy and religious studies from the California State University at Fullerton, an M.A. in religion from the Claremont Graduate School, and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of California at Santa Barbara. His 1999 thesis is titled Russell, Hayek, and the Mind-Body Problem.

Career

Feser is a professor of philosophy at Pasadena City College and has been a visiting assistant professor of philosophy at Loyola Marymount University and a visiting scholar at Bowling Green State University's Social Philosophy and Policy Center.

Called by National Review "one of the best contemporary writers on philosophy", Feser is the author of On Nozick; Philosophy of Mind; Locke; The Last Superstition: A Refutation of the New Atheism; Aquinas; Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction; Neo-Scholastic Essay; and Five Proofs of the Existence of God; the co-author of By Man Shall His Blood Be Shed: A Catholic Defense of Capital Punishment; and the editor of The Cambridge Companion to Hayek and Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. His primary academic research interests are in metaphysics, natural theology, the philosophy of mind, and moral and political philosophy.

Feser writes on politics and culture from a conservative point of view and on religion from a traditionalist Catholic perspective. His work has appeared in The American, The American Conservative, Catholic World Report, City Journal, The Claremont Review of Books, Crisis, First Things, Liberty, National Review, New Oxford Review, Nova et Vetera, Public Discourse, Reason, and TCS Daily.

Feser has defended Thomistic dualism.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Edward Feser” as american professor of philosophy. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1968-04-16. The account is most persuasive where Edward, Feser and American can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as american professor of philosophy. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15429164. VIAF identifies the subject as 33842016. The Library of Congress control number is n2003120870. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1999.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Edward Feser”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Edward Feser primary sources, Edward Feser archive and Edward research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Edward Feser”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Edward Feser” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.