CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Education Review

academic journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ110692613
Source-derived summary

Education Review (ISSN: 1094-5296) is an open-access academic journal publishing reviews of books in the field of education. It was established in 1998 by Gene V. Glass, Nicholas Burbules (University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign), and Kate Corby (Michigan State University). The journal publishes peer-reviewed essay reviews and reviews of recent scholarly books. The journal publishes books written in English, Spanish, and Portuguese spanning a wide range of education scholarship and practice across the globe. In addition, the journal

publishes "Acquired Wisdom", peer-reviewed autobiographical essays highlighting the intellectual development and pedagogical legacies of esteemed educational researchers.

Education Review is a signatory to the Budapest Open Access Initiative.

The journal has been served by a succession of editors since its inception:

Editors for English

Gene V. Glass Arizona State University (1998–2012, 2024– )

Nicholas Burbules University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (1998–2000)

Kate Corby, Brief Reviews Michigan State University (1998–2005)

Melissa Cast-Brede, Co-Editor University of Nebraska at Omaha (1998– )

David J. Blacker University of Delaware (2012–2014)

Gustavo Fishman Arizona State University (2015–2023)

Editors for Spanish and Portuguese

Gustavo Fishman Arizona State University (1998– )

Andréa Barbosa Gouveia, Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação, Brazil (2019–2023)

Karine Morgan, Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação, Brazil (2020– )

Editors for "Acquired Wisdom"

Sigmund Tobias New York University (2016–2018)

J. D. Fletcher Institute for Defense Analyses (2016–2018)

David C. Berliner Arizona State University (2016–2018)

Stacey J. Lee University of Wisconsin-Madison (2023–2025)

Phil Winne Simon Fraser University (2019–2023)

Frederick Erickson University of California, Los Angeles (2019–2025)

Sonia Nieto University of Massachusetts Amherst (2019–2022)

Gene V. Glass Arizona State University (2024– )

Managing Editors

Stephanie McBride-Schreiner Arizona State University (2015– ).

Adriana Ester Reichert Palu, Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação, Brazil (2020 – )

Education Review/Reseñas Educativas is supported by the Scholarly Communications Group at the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University and the Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação.

The journal was supported by the National Education Policy Center (https://nepc.colorado.edu) from 2010 until 2015 and from 2012 until 2014 by the College of Education and Human Services of the University of Delaware.

The journal is hosted by the Public Knowledge Project a non-profit research initiative that is focused on the importance of making the results of publicly funded research freely available through open access policies.

Editorial summary

“Education Review” enters the record as academic journal. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Education, Review and academic can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1094, 1998, 2012, 2024—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Education, Review and academic.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Education Review” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Education, Review and academic provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q110692613. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1094, 1998, 2012 and 2024.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Education Review”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Education Review primary sources, Education Review archive and Education research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Education Review”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Education Review” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.