CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Educational Research Review

journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 17, 2024
Entity authorityQ15756494 ↗
Source-derived summary

Educational Research Review is a triannual peer-reviewed academic review journal covering education. It was established in 2006 and is published by Elsevier on behalf of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI). The editor-in-chief is Hans Gruber (University of Regensburg). According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2022 impact factor of 11.7.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Educational Research Review” is journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Educational, Research and Review, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Educational, Research and Review is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 17, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q15756494. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006 and 2022.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Educational Research Review”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Educational Research Review primary sources, Educational Research Review archive and Educational research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Educational Research Review”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Educational Research Review” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.